January 24, 2012 by Irish Peloton
Same old Spaniard, always cheating
Alejandro Valverde won Stage Five of the Tour Down Under last week finishing first across the line at the top of Willunga Hill, just ahead of Simon Gerrans. Contrary to what Phil Liggett would have you believe, this was not the Spaniard’s first race in two years. He actually rode until May of 2010 but his ‘two-year’ suspension was back dated to January 2010. Consequently, it was his first race in 19 months.
Valverde won the stage thanks to the strength of his team. For the two laps of the circuit which brought the race over Willunga hill, there was a Movistar rider constantly at the front of the race, or thereabouts.
Before the decisive last two kilomtres, Valverde had Jose Ivan Gutierrez, and Angel Madrazo up the road.
The plan was for Valverde to bridge the gap to the front, then be aided by his team until the time came to launch the sprint for the finishing line. Which is exactly what happened. Valverde bridged and was shielded by Madrazo until the final few hundred metres where he latched on to Gerrans and sprinted by him for the stage win.
But the Movistar team cheated.
A hand-sling is a move used in the Madison track racing event. Rider A stretches his arm backwards waiting for his team-mate, Rider B, to come from behind and grab hold. Rider A then sacrifices much of his own momentum to propel Rider B forwards at a speed far greater than the speed at which he had initially approached Rider A.
‘Hand-sling’ is the colloquial term for this manouevre. It is known in the UCI rulebook as a flying relay. It is perfectly legal in Madison events on the track but during road racing it is forbidden.
But this is exactly what the Movistar team did when Jose Ivan Gutierrez gave Angel Madrazo a helping hand in the final kilomtres of Stage Five of the Tour Down under. This gave Madrazo the boost he needed to reach the leading group before Valverde’s group passed him out on the road. The result was that Madrazo was in a perfect position to aid his team leader in the final few hundred metres. A position which he may not have reached had he not cheated.
In 1972, former World Champion Hennie Kuiper won the Tour of Britain, finishing ahead of Marcel Duchemin. The Frenchman and his team lodged a complaint after the race claiming that the Dutch team had been giving Kuiper illegal hand-slings throughout the stage which ultimately led to Duchemin’s defeat. On this occassion, the complaint was ignored and Kuiper remained the winner.
But this was in an era where there weren’t several video cameras providing live high definition footage of the race. The footage of the alleged hand-slinging incidents was not available. For the 2012 Tour Down Under, this footage is available.
Race incident number 9, article 12.1.040 of the UCI regulations states that the punishment for performing an illegal flying relay in a road race (amongst team-mates) is a fine of 200 Swiss Francs and a penalty of 10 seconds.
Having contacted the UCI about this matter. A spokesman responded saying:
We will receive the race report from the international commissaire designated at the Tour Down Under. I don’t know yet whether or not this rider has been sanctioned for this infringement. He should have been. If not, unfortunately, we cannot sanction a rider retroactively for such an infringement.
From checking the stage times and overall times of the riders in question, it appears that no time penalties were incurred, leading to the conclusion that neither Gutierrez nor Madrazo were penalised for this infringement.
Apparently, we have a case of the UCI not applying their own rules.
In the past, Alejandro Valverde tried to gain an edge over his rivals by cheating and was suspended for two years as a result. In his first race back in the peloton, he has already won a race by gaining an edge over his rivals via cheating. It’s a pity nothing was done about it at the time.
Same old Spaniard, always cheating…
Update: I followed up with the UCI asking them the following questions:
Since the riders in question have not been sanctioned, why is this the case? Whose responsibility is it to bring this matter to the UCI’s attention? Does a complaint need to be made by an opposing team? Do the race organisers need to inform the UCI? Or is it the UCI’s responsibility to remain aware of these sorts of incidents themselves?
Also, since it is now impossible to sanction these riders retroactively, how long after the incident occurs must the riders be informed that they are being sanctioned? Before the podium presentation at the end of the stage? Before the end of the day on which the infringement took place? Or is it before the end of the entire stage race?
A spokesman repsonded:
The international commissaires are supposed to sanction the rider and respectively the team.
In this case, if a commissaire saw it, Gutierrez should have been sanctioned. I don’t know whether or not a commissaire was around or not at the time Gutierrez gave a flying relay to Madrazo. We will see this in the race report from the Down Under that we will receive in the next few days. The UCI is officially informed through the race reports, even though sometimes we know it before, almost instantaneously by phone.
Something is sure, this is bad that this scene was covered live on TV. This is not a good image for cycling.
Normally, a complaint has to be made directly after the race, or stage, so that the commissaires panel together with the organiser can discuss it and make a decision before the ranking is drawn and transmitted. Retroactively, it is possible but always more complicated to sanction a rider, especially if no complaints have been made right after the race. As far as I know, only in very serious cases the UCI can sanction a rider retroactively.
Jonathan - January 24, 2012 @ 12:33 pm
I saw that too and thought it was a bit shonky, if he’d done it in a sprint he would definitely have been disqualified (I seem to recall Freire got a sling at the Tour of the Basque Country last year or the year before and was relegated to the back of the group).
Pj Maguire - January 24, 2012 @ 1:35 pm
Not surprisingly no mention of this on cyclenews.com, typically ignoring any mistakes or inappropriate actions made by the UCI.
Irish Peloton - January 24, 2012 @ 1:44 pm
@Jonathan Well remembered. Although I don’t think it was quite a hand-sling.
You can see him nudging the rider in front of him out of the way. Then at 7m 36s he gets a bit of a push off his team-mate.
Neil Hutchins - January 24, 2012 @ 4:33 pm
Firstly, the title’s veering towards Xenophobia, which I’m not sure is acceptable, even if Spanish anti-doping procedures has been rightly criticised for being a bit more lax than some other countries.
Secondly…seriously, you’re taking the anti-Valverde hate a bit far for suggesting he should be penalised for a minor infringement of one of his colleagues. Furthermore, you need to get real – while it is a technical infringement, we see footage of riders getting hand-slings all the time, particularly team leaders being helped back to the peloton following a mechanical.
Thirdly, and this is massively controversial considering I do agree with most people that Valverde’s lack of contrition about his ban is massively arrogant, I do have to say, to win the toughest stage in your first race back after a ban (unlike most other riders returning who seem to take a year to regain full form) does show he’s an incredibly talented, classy and intelligent rider, despite what you might think of his morals as a human being.
Irish Peloton - January 24, 2012 @ 5:27 pm
The title is merely stating that Valverde is a Spaniard. If his name was two syllables, I would have stuck that in instead. I’m not casting aspersions on all Spaniards. There’s a bit of hyper-P.C.-ness going on there I think.
As regard the infringement itself, I agree, we see this in races all the time. But it’s not me who needs to get real, it’s the UCI. Why is it against the rules if anybody is allowed do it? Why do they bother having a rule against it if they’re not going to enforce it? If it’s a rule that’s at the discretion of the UCI and not always enforced, where do they draw the line? What other rules are the willing to ignore? Which rules are ignorable and which are not? This is what I am trying to highlight here. As I’ve highlighted before… http://irishpeloton.com/2011/11/1517/
Incredibly talented? Or still doping? He doesn’t think he did anything wrong before, so why would he stop doing it if it’s not wrong?
Michael - January 24, 2012 @ 8:45 pm
Meh, Madrazo neither bridged up to the front group, nor paced Valverde at any point, so it really didn’t make a difference in the end.
Stephen Salmon - February 10, 2012 @ 9:52 pm
Interesting piece, as they always are!
I have to say though if the piece is about the UCI and they’re inept ability to govern the greatest sport on earth then maybe you should have titled it differently hey?
I’m not bothered either way. Make no mistake, Valverde is an outstanding talent (just like Contador), and the day after he received his ban he was out on a 5 hour training spin.
But if I had my way he would have been banned for life but I don’t and he wasn’t.
The sad part for me with Valverde and AC for that matter is these guys are so good they probably never needed to dope in the first place. Such a shame.
Thanks again, thoroughly enjoyed it, as usual!
HEH - February 29, 2012 @ 12:21 pm
Man, quit whinning, seriously.
Antonio - February 29, 2012 @ 11:55 pm
What do you mean? Do you think that the Spaniards are all cheaters? Do you think that Valverde really have to be disqualified for that? Do you think Valverde won that day because he was doped? Valverde has already served his punishment and won because he is one of the most talented riders in the world. I think you hate to Valverde and you have no idea of cycling.
Diego - March 16, 2012 @ 1:14 am
¡¡¡¡¡¡Viva Valverde!!!!!!!!!!, .. irish peloton… tocinero!!, a tu madre se la folló un inglés. Bastard!!!